I really love this part. It makes me even more mindful of my own AI usage: when am I being lazy, and when am I really thinking?
“But to live well with machines is to insist that they serve our efforts at growth rather than replace them, that they enlarge the field for judgment instead of shrinking it. The task of becoming the person you want to be — the kind who can judge, discern, and act — cannot be outsourced. “
I'm reminded that, in a way, AI demands us to show up, and it will show up with our level of intelligence.
If we give it crap, it will also give back crap; it's not a free pass for thinking.
In fact, if we want to see what's truly possible, we really have to put in the work of becoming. @harry
один писатель фантаст написал роман об ученом который интересовался историе2 и думал чему история учит и как она может помочь понять настоящее и заглянуть в будущее но возможно что поиски ученых отчасти напоминают поиски кошки в темной комнате
I really love this part. It makes me even more mindful of my own AI usage: when am I being lazy, and when am I really thinking?
“But to live well with machines is to insist that they serve our efforts at growth rather than replace them, that they enlarge the field for judgment instead of shrinking it. The task of becoming the person you want to be — the kind who can judge, discern, and act — cannot be outsourced. “
I'm reminded that, in a way, AI demands us to show up, and it will show up with our level of intelligence.
If we give it crap, it will also give back crap; it's not a free pass for thinking.
In fact, if we want to see what's truly possible, we really have to put in the work of becoming. @harry
один писатель фантаст написал роман об ученом который интересовался историе2 и думал чему история учит и как она может помочь понять настоящее и заглянуть в будущее но возможно что поиски ученых отчасти напоминают поиски кошки в темной комнате